The killing of Fernando Villavicencio: when a nation loses its north

The killing of political opponents is not a new occurrence in history. Back in 44 B.C., Julius Cesar was assassinated by 60 Roman Senate Opposition members after he was stabbed for roughly 30 times. (National Geographic Society, 2022). However, in more recent years there have been other killings of political opponents. For example, in 2003 left-wing opposition leader Chokri Belaid of Tunisia was killed outside of his house; on April 2021, Chad President Idriss Deby Itno was killed – he was declared elections’ winners that year-; Japanese former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was murdered during a campaign speech in 2022. (A Look at High-Profile Political Assassinations This Century, n.d.)

However, political foes also took care of disputes in a different way, especially in the US, where duels were normal. For example: Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, Button Gwinnett and Lachlan McIntosh, and Secretary of State Henry Clay and Senator John Randolph in 1826, dueled due to different circumstances. These duels took place in a gentlemen manner, in order words at least at the time of attack one knew it. It was a face-to-face argument. (A Future American President’s Deadly Duel - National Constitution Center, 2021)

On August 9, 2023, eleven days prior to presidential elections; Fernando Villavicencio, presidential –center right- candidate, was killed during a rally in the north side of Quito. It was precisely the moment when democracy died in the country. Even considering the weak Rule of Law in Ecuador, Political opportunism and cynicism, the insecurity levels in the country; this was just a moment of despair, of solitude, a moment where the north of the country was lost.

Villavicencio’s dead represents the current state of the country. A country where interest groups –of different types- have the control of everything. And where things don’t go their way, they impose their way with terror and awe.

Comments

Saying No is hard; but in this case at what cost

Ecuador’s President, Daniel Noboa, called the electorate to the ballots on a National Referendum. The eleven questions established for this political process were in two main fields: security and labor market reforms. The Referendum took place on April 21, 2024. The official results of the National Referendum are that in 9 out 11 yes-no-questions the Ecuador’s electorate gave the option of Yes a majoritarian support to the Administration’s plans. However, two questions the support leaned towards No; those questions main focus was on reforms to labor and foreign investment. The following graph show the results of the Referendum. Graph 1 Results of the National Referendum Source: CNE (National Electorate Council for it acronym in Spanish) In the graphs, question D (3) stated that: Do you agree that the Ecuadorian State should recognize international arbitration as a method for resolving disputes in investment, contractual, or commercial matte...

An Unlikely Runoff: González vs. Noboa

Source: BBC News Mundo ( Luisa González & Daniel Noboa) Ecuador’s Presidential election took place on August, 20 th , 2023. According to the Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE) official information, with more than 98% of the ballots in, it shows that Luisa González and Daniel Noboa are headed to the runoff in October this year. González, a disciple and loyal follower of Rafael Correa, achieved the 33.6% of the electorate; while Noboa, a self-proclaimed “progressive” –left-leaning- entrepreneur and son of banana mogul, got 23.4% of the ballots on Sunday. In other words, only 5 out of ten people supported both candidates in this election. Hence, 50% of the other constituents voted for other candidate (one out of the other 6 candidates that run for office) that means the October runoff duo have much work to do to get bigger support within the next 50 days. However, the story goes beyond the introducing data presented in the earlier paragraph. The results show tha...

October 15th is upon Us: but the Light at the end of the Tunnel is not here

Ecuador’s elections would take place on October 15, 2023. The unlikely run-off between Luisa Gonzalez and Daniel Noboa would define who becomes President for nearly the next 18 months. The Myth of the Rational voter states the following: your vote (a single vote) would not make a difference in the outcome, the voter is more informed of things such as: a TV or media influencer than the political implication of the candidate’s plans for the country. And finally, according to the median voter model the candidates seek to achieve the votes of the people whom didn’t vote for them on the first round. As Bryan Caplan states in his book “The Myth of the Rational Voter”: “Familiarity with politicians’ voting records and policy positions is predictably close to nil even on high profile issues, but amazingly good on fun topics irrelevant to policy. As Delli Carpini and Keeter remark: During the 1992 presidential campaign 89 percent of the public knew th...

Austrian Knights

Search This Blog