Skip to main content

The hair of the dog

By Jimbo Ar

The expression “the Hair of the Dog” comes to mind when someone tries to understand Ecuador’s current economic affairs. The definition of that coloquial phrase, according to Dictionary.com, is the following:

“A morning drink may be the last thing you want after a night of boozing, but that’s exactly what this quirky English expression means. Originally, the expression referred to a method of treating a rabid dog bite; hair from the dog was placed in the wound. So in that sense, having another drink (any drink) is like taking hair from the dog that bit you.” (Where Did the Strange Expression “Hair of the Dog” Come From?, 2020)

    President Noboa is reaching its 90th day in Office. However, in this short period of time his administration has faced two main issues. The first it is the security control problems due to the presence of drug cartels and systematic corruption in all layers of the political and judicial systems. The second trouble is the economic situation of the country.

    In the first case, Noboa declared the country in a State of War. The enemy all drug traffickers and their organizations that are recognized as terrorists groups according to the 110 and 111 Presidential Decrees, signed into law on January 8th and 9th, 2024. However, the government now faces the unexpected and un planned cost of providing resources for security matters must be paid by someone. And as it always is; citizens must pay for government  expenses.

    Ecuador’s security is at a brink of reaching a point of no return and drug cartels and terrorist must be met with equal or more powerful force; it is not the best classical liberal option for the state to intervene. However, in the case of Ecuador it seem to be the best option available within a fast and available response.

    This means that Ecuador’s government deficit would increase from 6.1 billion dollars to cover the cost of the internal war. Hence, Noboa’s administration proposed a bill to congress where among other is the increase of Impuesto al Valor Agregado (IVA) -value added tax-, in order to cover the cost of war.

    As of right now, the National Assembly, the country's congress, discusses and argues about what goes in and out of the bill. Then President Noboa would veto, or partially veto the bill. Nevertheless, all ideas in the bill are about increasing taxes to the population.

    Sadly none, of the answers presented by the government follow in the following:

1. Reduce Government size and spending
2. Efficient government spending
3. Decrease CIT
4. Decrease the barriers of entry for entrepreneurs
5. Delete all government subsides on fossil fuels
6. Sign a Free-Trade-Agreement with the US

7. Delete all government free-market restrictions

    These are a few steps that a “well-intended government” must follow to clean and liberate the economy. However, if the government wants to keep the party going, means that the party must be paid and someone has to pay for it.

    If the party continues,  to hair the dog seems more likely. But the unexpected and horrendous consequences are yet to come, and the cure of “hair of the dog” is the cue to go. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

De-dollarizing an Economy is not an Easy Task but in the Case of Ecuador it Makes No Sense

By Jimbo Ar
Ecuador adopted the US Dollar as its currency on January, 2000. The country at the time had almost a 100% rate of inflation and it used the US currency for major transactions such as: house, cars, and importations purchases, to name a few. However, there was a huge social cost of implementing the US Dollar in Ecuador. The political cost took a big hit when President Mahuad was ousted due to his decision in 2000.      Former President Jamil Mahuad in his book called: "This is how we dollarize Ecuador" (2021), makes a detailed account of the economic conditions in which the country was prior to the execution of the executive decree to use the US dollar as the country's official currency.  Mainly, in its chapter IX "Hyperinflation and freezing." Mahuad mentions the following: “We then had a triple run: a bank run (due to the withdrawal of bank deposits), an exchange run (due to the loss of Central Bank reserves caused by the purchase of dollars) and a flight of cap
Post a Comment
Read more

Lasso: you failed

By Jimbo Ar
     Guillermo Lasso was elected as President of Ecuador in 2021. Since May of that year, Lasso demonstrated difficulties in managing its own political party, networking and lobbying with the National Assembly, and most of all keeping close his alliance with the Partido Social Cristiano’s Leader, Jaime Nebot.      Lasso backed his presidency initial months with a successful Covid-19 vaccination campaign, which was supported mainly by international organizations. But further than that; Lasso’s government is a failure. In an earlier post of this blog, it’s mentioned the following: “ With this in mind and having elections for president in Ecuador in 2024; time is an enemy for Lasso’s presidency. Ecuador’s President needs to increase speed in changes, reforms, and lobbying through a divided Assembly (Congress) to obtain legislation that allows: economic freedom, stronger rule of law, and presenting a positive environment for foreign investment. All these changes must be done quickly en
Post a Comment
Read more

An Unlikely Runoff: González vs. Noboa

By Jimbo Ar
Source: BBC News Mundo  ( Luisa González & Daniel Noboa) Ecuador’s Presidential election took place on August, 20 th , 2023. According to the Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE) official information, with more than 98% of the ballots in, it shows that Luisa González and Daniel Noboa are headed to the runoff in October this year. González, a disciple and loyal follower of Rafael Correa, achieved the 33.6% of the electorate; while Noboa, a self-proclaimed “progressive” –left-leaning- entrepreneur and son of banana mogul, got 23.4% of the ballots on Sunday. In other words, only 5 out of ten people supported both candidates in this election. Hence, 50% of the other constituents voted for other candidate (one out of the other 6 candidates that run for office) that means the October runoff duo have much work to do to get bigger support within the next 50 days.      However, the story goes beyond the introducing data presented in the earlier paragraph. The results show that Rafael Correa’s p
Post a Comment
Read more