Skip to main content

Step by Step


On Sunday September 28 of 2008, Ecuador adopted its 20th Constitution. The new elected Constitution has 444 articles and by far give more power to the state in what respect to the economy and the political system. About 64.04% of Ecuador’s voting population approved the new Magna Carta, while 28.01% voted “NO”, the null votes added to 7.21% (vote that represents neither yes or no) and blank votes were roughly 0.74%. The decision is clear; Ecuador is following the steps towards a socialist economy or what Mr. Chavez has claimed “Socialism of the 21st century.”

President Correa has aligned his government with the social, economical and political structures those countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia, and others in the Latin American continent. These socio-economic and political structures have been implemented through the region with more emphasis in the last five years. However, it is important to mention that Latin America has always suffered from high levels of dependency in governments. Latin America’s history is full of state intervention through mercantilism, wealth transfers (privileges), and political corruption. Alvaro Vargas Llosa in his essay, The Case of Latin America, says the following about Latin America’s history:

“Reform meant replacing inflation with new taxes, high tariffs with regional trading blocs, government monopolies with private monopolies, price controls with regulatory bodies.”

Ecuador needed to clean its old and corrupted political system; Rafael Correa, who is an economist by education, became the “savior” of the country. He promised to clean after the decadent political system and change the country’s direction for a better future. However, Ecuadorians have forgotten to ask Correa (if he does all what he said he would do) at the cost of what? In addition, to who ultimately will pay for it?

The new Constitution gives Correa the possibility to stay in power until 2017. It gives Correa control over the central bank, judiciary and electoral authority. Correa’s new tool (Ecuador’s 20th Constitution) will create a quasi-Congress, which will be integrated mostly by politicians from his own political party, Alianza Pais. Correa is certainly creating in the short-run but even more in the long-run higher levels of bureaucracy, less property rights protection, fewer incentives for entrepreneurial activity, and more unemployment.

Ecuador is sadly, “Step by Step” moving towards a socialist economy that will only lead the country to a social chaos. It seems that President Correa forgot about his economic education and has become a senseless politician. Ecuadorians are losing their individual liberty, and economic freedom. Robert Lawson mentions in his essay, Economic Freedom and Property Rights;

“After over a decade of research, the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly clear: Societies that organize themselves with private property, rule of law, and free markets outperform, on almost every measurable margin, societies that are less economically free”

Ecuadorians must not allow Correa to become a dictator. If we want a better country for our future and the future of our children then open your eyes and see beyond the false promises of a corrupt politician like Correa.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saying No is hard; but in this case at what cost

Ecuador’s President, Daniel Noboa, called the electorate to the ballots on a National Referendum. The eleven questions established for this political process were in two main fields: security and labor market reforms. The Referendum took place on April 21, 2024.      The official results of the National Referendum are that in 9 out 11 yes-no-questions the Ecuador’s electorate gave the option of Yes a majoritarian support to the Administration’s plans. However, two questions the support leaned towards No; those questions main focus was on reforms to labor and foreign investment. The following graph show the results of the Referendum. Graph 1 Results of the National Referendum Source: CNE (National Electorate Council for it acronym in Spanish)        In the graphs, question D (3) stated that: Do you agree that the Ecuadorian State should recognize international arbitration as a method for resolving disputes in investment, contractual, or commercial matte...

An Unlikely Runoff: González vs. Noboa

Source: BBC News Mundo  ( Luisa González & Daniel Noboa) Ecuador’s Presidential election took place on August, 20 th , 2023. According to the Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE) official information, with more than 98% of the ballots in, it shows that Luisa González and Daniel Noboa are headed to the runoff in October this year. González, a disciple and loyal follower of Rafael Correa, achieved the 33.6% of the electorate; while Noboa, a self-proclaimed “progressive” –left-leaning- entrepreneur and son of banana mogul, got 23.4% of the ballots on Sunday. In other words, only 5 out of ten people supported both candidates in this election. Hence, 50% of the other constituents voted for other candidate (one out of the other 6 candidates that run for office) that means the October runoff duo have much work to do to get bigger support within the next 50 days.      However, the story goes beyond the introducing data presented in the earlier paragraph. The results show tha...

October 15th is upon Us: but the Light at the end of the Tunnel is not here

Ecuador’s elections would take place on October 15, 2023. The unlikely run-off between Luisa Gonzalez and Daniel Noboa would define who becomes President for nearly the next 18 months.      The Myth of the Rational voter states the following: your vote (a single vote) would not make a difference in the outcome, the voter is more informed of things such as: a TV or media influencer than the political implication of the candidate’s plans for the country.  And  finally, according to the median voter model  the candidates seek to achieve the votes of the people whom didn’t vote for them on the first round.  As Bryan Caplan states in his book “The Myth of the Rational Voter”: “Familiarity with politicians’ voting records and policy positions is predictably close to nil even on high profile issues, but amazingly good on fun topics irrelevant to policy. As Delli Carpini and Keeter remark: During the 1992 presidential campaign 89 percent of the public knew th...