Skip to main content

The Economic and Political Implications of the Bail-out

After listening to President Bush about the Bail-out plan, I could not stop but wonder why once again the government is getting people out of trouble at the expense of others who have not made the same mistakes. The government has intervened one more time in the economy (and not for good). It was not enough already for the law makers to worked by privatizing profits and socializing rick and costs. The current solution according to President Bush is a 700 billion dollars bail-out. In other words, this bail-out will make you and me pay for companies and other people who became blind folded and put themselves at a high risk. Now, social cost of government intervention in the economy has spread throughout the nation and it also will impact in the international markets.

The political campaigns of Senators Obama and McCain have blamed the greed of Wall Street for this crisis. Greed is a factor in life that is always going to be present. It (greed) is a quality among people like gravity is what holds us down and keeps our feet on the surface of Earth. Both political campaigns have not come up with an actual plan that may lead us out of this situation (I am not surprised either). But financial markets do not need of a plan created by politicians or governments. The financial markets need not to be interrupted by any form of intervention.

People think that companies are taking advantage of this crisis and helping themselves to increase their profits. Well, this is not the case; the intervention of the state in the market has created misleading information taken by for-profit companies. When prices are been manipulated by governments entrepreneurial activity is condemned to die, companies will not generate profits and people will lose their jobs.

The interventions of the government in the financial markets have falsely shown people that jumping off from the 5th floor of a building is a great idea. People are going to keep on jumping after this bail-out passes through Congress. However, people now are going to jump from the 20th floor. Now more people will jump off the building at a cost that is also been paid by the people who know that jumping is not an option and then we will have a higher social cost. Professor Peter Boettke has said, in his latest blog entry called “PLEASE, just Say No!,” that intervention or government bail-out is not going to get us out of this crisis.

“To try to throw money at a problem that was caused by a system of incentives that said we will bail you out when your risky investments go sour is merely to reinforce the perverse incentives that caused the problem in the first place --- JUST SAY NO.”

People need to know that good intentions are not equal to good results. Politicians as greedy people are going to make you think that they are doing the best for all of us. But reality shows us the opposite. History reveals us that excessive intervention in the market economy will lead us to failure. Let us hope that the government would not screw up the set of rules and let the market take of its illnesses.


Popular posts from this blog

The Failure of the “Market Failure” Argument

Dr. John Hasnas, Law professor at Georgetown University, gave a lecture to the Students for Liberty (Webminar Series) on November 8, 2010. Hasnas lecture was not on the Market Failure (MF) but rather the FAILURE of the Market Failure argument. Hasnas exposed his arguments against the MF from his knowledge in law and ethics. Hasnas could not being more eloquent in establishing the distinction of what constitutes for him the disappointment in the argumentation of the defenders of the subject in question.
I will now share my notes from Hasnas’ lecture:
The Market Failure (Definition according to Hasnas): The market is full with transactions that happen simultaneously. There are unregulated voluntary as well as regulated voluntary transactions. However, the market failure occurs when the good outcome(s) of these transactions affect negatively third parties. Advocates of the MF often mention the following examples when the “market fails;” air pollution, deforestation, water contamination t…

Get the Hell Out!

The Ecuadorian government has declared “Persona non grata” to the United States Ambassador, Heather Dodges. Ricardo Patiño, Ecuador’s Foreign Minister, asked Hodges to leave Ecuador as soon as possible due to a WIKILEAKS cable where the Ambassador alleged police corruption, which was known by Ecuador’s government (FOXNEWS)

Patiño requested Hodges to leave after she did not provide the explanation Patiño looked for. Ecuador’s Foreign Minister was unsatisfied with Hodges’ explanation. Hodges said that the information was stolen from the United States Government. Therefore, she had nothing to explain to Ecuadorian authorities. The cable leak first appeared in the Spanish newspaper El País.

Whether Heather Hodges sent a cable or not. Ecuador’s government has no support to base diplomatic decisions of expelling a foreign diplomat on those grounds. Ecuador’s government is not only battling domestic disagreement with Rafael Correa’s administration but also foreign. What is next?

We will Win the Battle

Lawrence Reed, President of the Foundation for Economic Education, makes a remarkable speech at Americans for Prosperity's 2011 Defending the American Dream Summit in Jasper, GA. The video does not need any other comment except that it is worth your time. Enjoy!

Remeber: The battle is not over. We, Classical Liberals, Free-Markets, and Humanity, will WIN.